|
The suffering
of Algeria's women at the hands of Islamists
"The treatment of women
raises serious questions about the level of faith and Islamic behavior on the
part of the protagonists in the civil war in Algeria. Islam itself is
being disfigured and perverted!"
Aicha Lemsine, Middle East Times, Cairo, March 16, 2001
The human rights of ordinary
Algerians, and in particular Algerian women, are under siege. Crimes against
human dignity occur every day, with women the targets of much of the violence.
Yet Algerian women have been
tragically ignored by their government and forgotten by the national and
international media. International humanitarian organizations have yet to
respond in any meaningful way.
Do they know that women and girls
are dying in terrorist attacks across Algeria? Two hundred women have been
killed over the last three years, aside from those who have
"disappeared."
As in Bosnia, Algerian women are
the first victims of the civil war in their country. In the Balkans, rape and
forced pregnancy were tactics of "ethnic cleansing"; in Algeria, the
persecution of women is a key element of "religious cleansing."
Young or old, veiled or not,
Algerian women are powerful symbols for all of the rival factions vying for
power. Some kill women because they wear the hijab, or headscarf.
Other women are targeted because
they are intellectuals, because they work and because they are resolutely and
unabashedly modern.
Why this persecution of women?
Why, of all the Islamists in all the countries of the Arab-Muslim world, do the
Islamists of Algeria alone kill women as a matter of strategy?
Old women have had their throats
slit in their own homes, like 94-year-old Boudjar Kethoum of Sidi Bel-Abbes.
Students, both veiled and
unveiled, have been gunned down in the street, kidnapped or raped and then
murdered like 19-year-old Zoulikha Boughadou and her 15-year-old sister, Saida.
Four young Algerian women lost
their lives in three separate incidents. One of these, 15-year-old Fatima
Ghodbane, was dragged from her school by six gunmen who then slit her throat.
A second, Yamina Amrani, was
pregnant when she was killed by eight men in her home in Tessala El-Mardja.
Three men shot dead Amel Guedjali,
19, and her sister Karima, 18, in front of their father and a younger sister in
their house outside Algiers.
These are not unique cases. Women
die day after day.
Discussion of war crimes against
women (carried out in their own country by their own countrymen) is not to deny
the tragedy of the thousands of male victims cut down by terrorism since 1992.
Rather it is intended to break the silence surrounding the agony of Algerian
women.
The present situation in Algeria
is different from that of Egypt, Palestine and even Afghanistan. In these cases,
although state authorities and their Islamist rivals are locked in battles for
power, both sides pursue strategies and tactics in which barbarous treatment of
women and children is more or less avoided.
In Algeria, by contrast, wall
posters threaten women with death if they go to the hammam (public baths for
women), frequent beauty salons, work, play sports or study music or art. The
hijab is now the supreme obligation.
The treatment of women raises
serious questions about the level of faith and Islamic behavior on the part of
the protagonists in the civil war in Algeria.
All involved-the state
functionaries, the police, the military and the Islamists-are Muslims. Even
Islamic activists like Sudan's Hassan Al Turabi have disavowed the war against
Algerian women.
Tunisian Islamist Rachid
Ghannouchi declared, "As Islamists ourselves, we are ashamed at what
Algerian Islamists are doing to women!"
Only ashamed? Islam itself is
being disfigured and perverted! To see how far events in Algeria have strayed
from the ideals of the faith, one need only recall the celebrated case of Hind,
wife of the leader of the pagan Quraysh of Mecca and perhaps the Prophet
Muhammad's fiercest enemy, Abu Sufyan.
During the Battle of Uhud (625
CE), which pitted the Meccans against the Muslims, Hind roamed the battlefield
defiling the corpses of the Muslim dead, cutting off their ears and noses and
stringing them on her necklace. She also paid a Meccan slave to seek out and
slay Hamza, an uncle of the Prophet, during the battle.
Yet Hind was not condemned to
death by either the Prophet or his Companions. When the Muslims entered Mecca
five years after Uhud, Hind was among those who came to give their allegiance to
Muhammad. She responded to the Prophet's terms with bitter sarcasm.
When Muhammad forbade the Meccans
from killing their children (infanticide being common in pre-Islamic Arabia),
Hind snapped, "Do we have any children left that you didn't kill at Badr?"
referring to a battle where a small band of Muslims exacted heavy losses on the
Quraysh.
Despite her actions and her
attitude, Hind was spared, as were the other women who opposed Islam in its
formative period.
This was the "golden
era" of the Prophet Muhammad and the four "rightly guided"
caliphs; Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman and Ali.
After that time obscurantism and
the most retrograde misogyny reversed the position of Muslim women.
The only case of wise government
mentioned in the Koran is that of a woman-Bilqis, the Queen of Sheba. Closer to
our time, in 1250 CE, Shagarat Al Dur ruled Egypt and had the Friday prayers
said in her name in the country's mosques.
Therefore, one must ask where the
self-proclaimed Islamists find their program for society, in which women are
made subservient under the law and which bases its future upon the corpses of
women.
Aicha Lemsine is an
award-winning Algerian author. She lives in Algeria and publishes political
analyses in the Algerian and international Arab press. She is a member of the
PEN Club's International Women's Committee and vice-president of WORLD, the
Women's Organization for Rights, Literature and Development.
|